Lancaster City Council set its revenue budget for 2009/10 this week, with a Full Council Meeting reversing an earlier decision to close Morecambe Dome, keeping open all but two public toilets that had been ear marked for closure and removing the proposed £20,000 cut to Lancaster and Morecambe Citizens Advice Bureaux.

Setting the budget at £23.999 million, Council accepted many of the recommendations prepared by Cabinet but also made a number of changes, which include:

  • Keeping The Dome in Morecambe open for the 2009/10 season.Morecambe councillors argued The Platform is too small to host major events in the town, ignoring the fact that the venue is scheduled to be closed anyway in the near future despite this decision
  • Removing the £20,000 cut to Lancaster and Morecambe Citizens Advice Bureaux in 2009/10. There will therefore be no cuts to the funding they receive next year and will be given a grant totalling £182,800. Keeping open all but two toilets. The only toilets to close will be at the end of Regent Road and on the promenade outside The Dome in Morecambe. That decision followed an investigation by the Council’s Overview and Scrutiny Committee just one day before the Full Council meeting which rejected the proposal for the adoption of a ‘Richmond Scheme’ which would have seen toilets replaced by access to local business ‘facilities’. Councillors argued the cuts were disproportinate
  • Retaining the Catch the Wind kite festival and Sandcastle Festival instead of the Lancaster Jazz Festival which will not now take place in 2009.
  • Restoring £20,000 of the £40,000 reduction to The Dukes in Lancaster. The theatre will now receive £147,800 instead of the previously proposed £127,800.

The Lancaster Guardian reports that some of the extra cash to keep the Dome and public toilets open was found from a £1.1million council fund used for art and leisure provision.

“In common with other public bodies we were faced with tough choices when setting our budget,” commented Coun Abbott Bryning, Leader of Lancaster City Council. “The recession has impacted heavily on our finances and because we have less money coming in we have less to spend.

“Inevitably this has meant that some services we may had wanted to maintain or expand have had to be scaled back or ended completely.

“These choices have had to make to balance our books and ensure we provide a set of good quality core services which can continue to operate effectively.”

Cuts agreed by the Council’s Cabinet and accepted by Full Council include

  • Scrapping Lancaster’s International Youth Games
  • Salt Ayre Sports Centre will have its budget cut by 10% — £119,000. The Council is looking at ways to reduce costs at the Centre but the cut could mean it will close for two days a week
  • Reductions in mowing at Lancaster Cemetery and on Broadway Bridge, Morecambe.
  • £400 cut to the Mayoral budget
  • Scrapping the Festivals Innovation Fund
  • Cuts to 15 other organisations including charities and arts bodies
  • Scrapping plans to introduce school recycling

Council has previously set next year’s increase in Council Tax at 4%. This means that from April 2009 Lancaster City Council’s proportion of Council Tax will be around £3.56 a week on average.

The city council retains around 13% of the total Council Tax bill with the remainder going to Lancashire County Council (74%) Lancashire Police Authority (9%) and Lancashire Combined Fire Authority (4%).

These authorities have increased their precepts as follows:

  • Lancashire County Council: 2.9%
  • Lancashire Police Authority: 4.5%
  • Lancashire Combined Fire Authority: 3.74%

In addition, residents living in parished areas pay a precept to their parish council. Excluding Parish precepts the overall basic Band D increase in Council Tax will be 3.22%.

2 Replies to “Dome, Citizens Advice and Toilets Gain Cuts Reprieve”

  1. Labour, Conservatives and Liberal-Democrats voted to rejig the cuts proposed by cabinet replacing cuts to the Dukes Theatre and Citizens Advice Bureau with cuts that are likely to fall on Summer playschemes and Youth Sports Activities.The budget that we started with at the beginning of the meeting was bad enough, what we have ended up with is a real dogs-dinner – where ever you live in the District you will be affected one way or another by the cuts in this budget. Whilst some groups have ended up winners, this really has been a case of robbing Janet & John to pay Peter & Paul. Whatever way you look at it this was a bad day for the district.
    Cllr Chris Coates

  2. virtual-lancaster has received this letter regarding the Council’s Budget from Councillor Ron Sands (Heysham North Ward)…

    Although I was pleased to support the council vote to save the Dome for another nine months, it was a pity that the money should have to come from a contingency fund earmarked for children’s play areas across the whole district – especially when our promenade can boast the very best play areas – and which might themselves badly need that fund as the months pass by. But what I really found distasteful about the debate was the way in which so many Morecambe councillors supported the argument that “Lancaster gets everything and Morecambe gets nothing”.

    This argument does not stand up to close examination, and falsely presents Morecambe as a poor neighbour when in my opinion the resort is definitely superior to our historic county town in so many ways. We have the splendidly wheelchair friendly Happy Mount Park – much refurbished of late and now with a Splashpool of incredible popularity. We have five miles of level promenade with the Tern project, the Eric statue, the extended stone jetty, viewpoint carparks, and perhaps the most important innovation of all – the 99,000 tons of soft golden sands that have been deposited on our beaches.

    All these features require a big chunk of the council’s daily maintenance budget that has no precise equivalent in Lancaster.

    By so constantly bewailing Morecambe’s allegedly second class status, too many Morecambe councillors nurture an inferiority complex that holds us back from realising our full potential… And denies us the justified pride we should all take in these features that I have listed.

    Not to mention lots of other pluses not directly in the council’s budget but which were much influenced by past council decisions. For instance: the fact that the shell of the Winter Gardens building was saved for posterity; that the incredible art deco Midland Hotel was triumphantly revived; and that other features such as a multi screen cinema, bowling alley, indoor market, supermarket and swimming pool/gym complex were encouraged. All standing on what was previously wasted land connected with our unnecessarily extensive rail head.

    All these improvements had to be planned for and facilitated by past council budgets.

    No, if you really want to see a seaside resort that is seriously down on its uppers, you need only travel thirty miles to the south. You would see there something that is really, REALLY, worth moaning about.

    Councillor Ron Sands
    Heysham North Ward.

Comments are closed.